Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: ZSH's future - POSIX
- X-seq: zsh-workers 500
- From: Geoff Wing <mason@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: mdb@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Mark Borges)
- Subject: Re: ZSH's future - POSIX
- Date: Fri, 27 Oct 1995 18:16:16 +1000 (EST)
- In-reply-to: <9510262244.AA21513@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> from "Mark Borges" at Oct 26, 95 04:44:33 pm
- Sender: mason@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
:>> Zoltan Hidvegi(Z) wrote:
:>> The code should conform to the IEEE POSIX 1003.1 standard and to
:>> the proposed ANSI-C standard so that it should be portable to all
:>> such
:Z> Thanks to Richard, zsh is one of the most portable program I've
:Z> ever seen. I think ksh could'n beat it.
:Yes, I agree. Richard should take a bow here ;-).
I seem to remember there was a problem with some of the stat() and associated
stuff. Mainly because POSIX doesn't support all the S_I*() stuff used.
There would need to be a large rewrite of one part of code to make it fully
POSIX compatible. One really big drawback with POSIX compatibility is its
lack of support for things like symbolic-links, sockets, etc.
--
Mason [G.C.W] mason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx "Hurt...Agony...Pain...LOVE-IT"
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author