Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Hey, who did this ?!?!
- X-seq: zsh-workers 765
- From: schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Barton E. Schaefer)
- To: Eskandar Ensafi <esky@xxxxxxxxxxx>, zsh-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Hey, who did this ?!?!
- Date: Fri, 16 Feb 1996 10:50:49 -0800
- In-reply-to: Eskandar Ensafi <esky@xxxxxxxxxxx> "Hey, who did this ?!?!" (Feb 16, 10:34am)
- References: <9602161834.AA08343@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Feb 16, 10:34am, Eskandar Ensafi wrote:
} Subject: Hey, who did this ?!?!
}
} A while back, we made certain corrections to zsh so that termcap entries
} are correctly intitialized in non-interactive shells, in order to allow
} print -P '%B...%b' sequences and similar text attributes/cursor motion
} commands to work properly in shell scripts.
}
} I just noticed that in zsh 2.6 beta 12 and 13, this feature has been turned
} off again -- pehaps by accident, perhaps due to execessive, unwarranted
} concerns for efficiency.
I believe the reason was because on some systems, scripts that don't
have a controlling terminal (or that are in the background) cause some
kind of an error, or get stopped by SIGTTIN, when initializing termcap.
Am I remembering wrong?
--
Bart Schaefer Vice President, Technology, Z-Code Software
schaefer@xxxxxxxxxx Division of NCD Software Corporation
http://www.well.com/www/barts
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author