Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: quoting bug, and comparisons with ksh93

X-seq: zsh-workers 1408
From: Zoltan Hidvegi <hzoli@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: stephens@xxxxxxxxxxx (Bruce Stephens)
Subject: Re: quoting bug, and comparisons with ksh93
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 1996 16:37:13 +0200 (MET DST)
Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <199606211424.QAA04218@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> from Bruce Stephens at "Jun 21, 96 04:24:59 pm"
Organization: Dept. of Comp. Sci., Eotvos University, Budapest, Hungary
Phone: (36 1)2669833 ext: 2667, home phone: (36 1) 2752368

> Moving to another topic, I was reading about ksh93 in the recent AT&T
> book on reusable UNIX software.  They've extended the pattern syntax
> so it's equivalent to egrep style regexps (my guess is that zsh's are
> pretty close), and added the nice touch that some option of print will
> convert from a regexp to a ksh pattern.  There are lots of handy
> things for writing scripts, but I tend to use zsh only interactively,
> so for all I know some of these may already exist, although some
> definitely don't: I can't have a variable called a.fred, for example.

ksh93 has many powerful features for scripts.  I admit that for scripts
sometime ksh93 may be better than zsh.  But after the zsh-3.0 we can add
the missing features.  I have already made some experiments with dynamic
loading.  It is very easy to implement is on elf systems.  What I do not
know yet is the best interface to modules.  Mudules will certainly appear
after zsh-3.0 is out.

Zoltan

References:
- Re: quoting bug, and comparisons with ksh93
  - From: Bruce Stephens

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author