Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Z-Shell Frequently Asked Questions (monthly posting)
- X-seq: zsh-workers 1766
- From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxx>, zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Z-Shell Frequently Asked Questions (monthly posting)
- Date: Thu, 25 Jul 1996 08:42:47 -0700
- In-reply-to: Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxx>        "Z-Shell Frequently Asked Questions (monthly posting)" (Jul 25, 10:12am)
- References: <199607250812.KAA18570@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: schaefer@xxxxxxx
On Jul 25, 10:12am, Peter Stephenson wrote:
} Subject: Z-Shell Frequently Asked Questions (monthly posting)
}
} A4) What's the latest version?
} 
}   The release of zsh 3.0 is imminent; currently 3.0-pre3 is available.
} 
}   Note that even numbered minor versions are not released.
Um, 3.0 is an even-numbered minor version.  Are we revising this policy?
} B2) Similarities with csh
} 
}     Alternative syntax `if ( ... ) ...' (also `for', `which'; this now
}       requires the CSH_JUNKIE_PAREN option).
True only for 2.5.xx and some 2.6.xx.  CSH_JUNKIE_PAREN is gone again in
3.0, as you mentioned later.  However, you should probably point out that
`if ( ... ) ...' doesn't work like csh, it just looks like csh.  One still
has to replace the ( ) with [[ ]] in most csh-conversion cases.
-- 
Bart Schaefer                             Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts            http://www.nbn.com/people/lantern
New male in /home/schaefer:
>N  2 Justin William Schaefer  Sat May 11 03:43  53/4040  "Happy Birthday"
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author