Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: zsh-3.0-pre4 released
- X-seq: zsh-workers 1788
- From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Zoltan Hidvegi <hzoli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: zsh-3.0-pre4 released
- Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1996 21:30:03 -0700
- Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: Zoltan Hidvegi <hzoli@xxxxxxxxxx> "zsh-3.0-pre4 released" (Jul 27, 4:06am)
- References: <199607270206.EAA04563@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: schaefer@xxxxxxx
On Jul 27, 4:06am, Zoltan Hidvegi wrote:
} Subject: zsh-3.0-pre4 released
}
} Traps defined by a TRAPxxx function work as
} before. TRAPxxx functions are undefined if the trap builtin is used to
} modify the corresponding trap.
Hmm ... you seem to be saying that
TRAPHUP() { echo Hangup }
trap "echo Hang UP" 1
causes an implicit "unfunction TRAPHUP". What, then, happens if
trap "echo Hangup" 1
TRAPHUP() { echo Hang UP }
?? Does the TRAPHUP definition cause an implicit "trap - 1"? Or do both
traps fire?
--
Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.nbn.com/people/lantern
New male in /home/schaefer:
>N 2 Justin William Schaefer Sat May 11 03:43 53/4040 "Happy Birthday"
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author