Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: zsh-3.0-pre4 released
- X-seq: zsh-workers 1789
- From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Zoltan Hidvegi <hzoli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: zsh-3.0-pre4 released
- Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1996 21:57:46 -0700
- In-reply-to: Zoltan Hidvegi <hzoli@xxxxxxxxxx> "zsh-3.0-pre4 released" (Jul 27, 4:06am)
- References: <199607270206.EAA04563@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: schaefer@xxxxxxx
On Jul 27, 4:06am, Zoltan Hidvegi wrote:
} Subject: zsh-3.0-pre4 released
}
} -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
}
} Besides the many bugfixes in this release the biggest change is in this
} release is in trap handling.
Actually, I'd say the biggest change is "setopt nofoo" == "unsetopt foo".
Which I still think should have been left out until some post-3.0 version.
However, if it's staying, then this:
+ The following options are set if the shell is invoked as \fIsh\fP or
+ \fIksh\fP:
+ .BR NO_BAD_PATTERN ,
+ .BR NO_BANG_HIST ,
+ .BR NO_EQUALS ,
+ .BR NO_FUNCTION_ARGZERO ,
+ .BR GLOB_SUBST ,
+ .BR NO_HUP ,
+ .BR INTERACTIVE_COMMENTS ,
+ .BR KSH_ARRAYS ,
+ .BR NO_MULTIOS ,
+ .BR NO_NOMATCH ,
+ .BR RM_STAR_SILENT ,
+ .BR SH_FILE_EXPN ,
+ .BR SH_GLOB ,
+ .BR SH_OPTION_LETTERS ,
Should probably change to this:
+ The following options are set if the shell is invoked as \fIsh\fP or
+ \fIksh\fP:
+ .BR GLOB_SUBST ,
+ .BR INTERACTIVE_COMMENTS ,
+ .BR KSH_ARRAYS ,
+ .BR RM_STAR_SILENT ,
+ .BR SH_FILE_EXPN ,
+ .BR SH_GLOB ,
+ .BR SH_OPTION_LETTERS ,
+ .BR SH_WORD_SPLIT .
+ The following options are not set if the shell is invoked as \fIsh\fP
+ or \fIksh\fP:
+ .BR BAD_PATTERN ,
+ .BR BANG_HIST ,
+ .BR EQUALS ,
+ .BR FUNCTION_ARGZERO ,
+ .BR HUP ,
+ .BR MULTIOS ,
+ .BR NOMATCH .
I must say, having an option called BAD_PATTERN feels rather odd to me.
Since we have IGNORE_BRACES, either we should have IGNORE_BAD_PATTERN,
or else we should have just BRACES. Or it should have been left alone.
And then there's HIST_NO_STORE (why not HIST_STORE?), HIST_IGNORE_DUPS,
HIST_IGNORE_SPACE and PUSHD_IGNORE_DUPS. Why "fix" only the ones that
happen to begin with "NO"? If we're making all the options have a
"positive" sense, then let's do it right, otherwise don't do it.
I think the hobgoblins have introduced a foolish consistency here.
--
Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.nbn.com/people/lantern
New male in /home/schaefer:
>N 2 Justin William Schaefer Sat May 11 03:43 53/4040 "Happy Birthday"
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author