Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Procmail rejects zsh as being "broken"
- X-seq: zsh-workers 1872
- From: Bruce Stephens <stephens@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: hzoli@xxxxxxxxxx (Zoltan Hidvegi)
- Subject: Re: Procmail rejects zsh as being "broken"
- Date: Thu, 1 Aug 1996 15:07:06 +0200 (MET DST)
- Cc: srb@xxxxxxx, pws@xxxxxx, zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <199608011302.PAA27110@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> from "Zoltan Hidvegi" at Aug 1, 96 03:02:48 pm
> Well, when zsh is invoked as zsh it does not pretend to be Bourne shell
> compatible.  That's not a bug.  Zsh is really Bourne compatible if called
> as sh.  The complicated *zsh* test in procmail is unnecessary.  It'll never
> work.  The problem is that procmail tells that zsh is broken.  Zsh is not
> broken, it is simply different from a Bourne shell when invoked as zsh.
> Procmail should just inform the user that it uses /bin/sh or whatever
> instead of zsh and should not spread misinformation about zsh.
> 
> Zoltan
Darn.  I was about to say this.  It's perfectly reasonable for the
package to default to /bin/sh, since I don't care what shell it uses,
for the most part.  And /bin/sh might well be zsh in disguise, but
that's OK because when invoked as /bin/sh, it'll work as procmail
expects.
--
Bruce Stephens			| email: B.Stephens@xxxxxxxxxxx
Utrecht University              | telephone: +31 30 2534630
Department of Mathematics       | telefax:   +31 30 2518394
P.O. Box 80010, 3508 TA Utrecht |
The Netherlands                 |
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author