Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: Procmail rejects zsh as being "broken"

X-seq: zsh-workers 1884
From: Zefram <A.Main@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: srb@xxxxxxx (Stephen R. van den Berg)
Subject: Re: Procmail rejects zsh as being "broken"
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 1996 01:59:59 +0100 (BST)
Cc: hzoli@xxxxxxxxxx, pws@xxxxxx, zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <199608011444.QAA30597@xxxxxxxxxxxx> from "Stephen R. van den Berg" at Aug 1, 96 04:44:51 pm

>+	*[zc]sh*) echo "Warning: really perverted make detected"; SHELL="";;

Wouldn't it be better to do the feature tests, ignoring the name in
$SHELL?  Maybe some perverted admin has a copy of sh under the name
zsh.  Or even better, just use /bin/sh, which is Bourne-compatible
everywhere, rather than accepting whatever $SHELL happens to be.

-zefram

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Procmail rejects zsh as being "broken"
  - From: Stephen R. van den Berg

References:
- Re: Procmail rejects zsh as being "broken"
  - From: Stephen R. van den Berg

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author