Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: 3.0-pre6 expansion bug
- X-seq: zsh-workers 1931
- From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxx>, zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Zsh hackers list)
- Subject: Re: 3.0-pre6 expansion bug
- Date: Wed, 7 Aug 1996 09:43:02 -0700
- In-reply-to: Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxx> "Re: 3.0-pre6 expansion bug" (Aug 7, 10:57am)
- References: <199608070857.KAA23899@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: schaefer@xxxxxxx
On Aug 7, 10:57am, Peter Stephenson wrote:
} Subject: Re: 3.0-pre6 expansion bug
}
} > Attempt to inungetc() at start of input.
}
} I've handled this as a special case: the character is itself pushed
} onto the stack for rereading. This doesn't happen very often ---
} judging by the lack of previous bug reports --- so this should be fine.
I've always wondered why inungetc() didn't just do that all along.
--
Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.nbn.com/people/lantern
New male in /home/schaefer:
>N 2 Justin William Schaefer Sat May 11 03:43 53/4040 "Happy Birthday"
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author