Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Final 3.0.0 test release
- X-seq: zsh-workers 1977
- From: Richard Coleman <coleman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Final 3.0.0 test release
- Date: Wed, 14 Aug 1996 16:45:31 -0400
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 14 Aug 1996 11:11:24 PDT." <960814111125.ZM12797@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> } I've put together the final 3.0.0 release but before I release it I'd like
> } some other people to try it.
>
> I still object to having a configure test for the default behavior of
> BSD_ECHO when run as "sh". This should NOT be something that varies
> from one installation to the next!
>
> For one thing, people who already have an older version of zsh linked
> to sh will end up with the same (possibly wrong) behavior that they had
> before.
>
> For another, it breaks the whole notion of being able to rely on the
> consistent behavior of the shell following "emulate -R ...".
I completely agree...
The options for zsh when called as sh, should not depend on
your current configuration. It is especially bad for us sysadmins
who work on heterogenous environments.... I don't want zsh working
one way on one machine, and another way on another machine.
One of the reasons people install third party shells is to get
consistency across their various platforms.
rc
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author