Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: zsh-3.0.0 installed in the US
- X-seq: zsh-workers 2034
- From: Tom Kaczmarski <tkaczma@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Andrew Cosgriff <ajc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: zsh-3.0.0 installed in the US
- Date: Tue, 20 Aug 1996 07:55:33 -0500 (CDT)
- Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <wiohk6q1pz.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
On 20 Aug 1996, Andrew Cosgriff wrote:
> Well, I appreciate the comment, but it's hardly a solution to the problem,
> since some of us can't go upgrading our OSes willy-nilly, and besides that,
> zsh used to compile just fine before before the pre-3.0 releases.
Hmmmm, if you can't upgrade OSes "willy nilly" you probably shouldn't be
upgradink shells by the same token.
> Solaris 2.3 isn't *that* bad - we've got production systems using it quite
> happily, and as much as i'd like to see them on 2.5.1, it hasn't made it into
> our development schedules just yet.
It takes a couple minutes per machine given that you have a fast CDROM.
> (oh, and yes, i do have a few 2.5 and 2.5.1 machines, but i haven't tried
> building zsh on them yet...)
It should go without a snag. We don't have 2.5.1 yet because we haven't
run into a need for it yet. We'll probably upgrade sometime when we have
nothing better to do. ;) We != luc.edu.
I hope you find your answer;
Tom
?
''~``
( o o )
+----------------------------------.oooO--(_)--Oooo.------------------------+
mailto:tkaczma@xxxxxxx
http://orion.it.luc.edu/~tkaczma
.oooO (312) 512-7302
( ) Oooo.
+-------------------------------------\ (----( )--------------------------+
\_) ) /
(_/
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author