Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: 3.0.0 configure failure (bug in autoconf 2.10?)
- X-seq: zsh-workers 2038
- From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Bob Glickstein <bobg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: 3.0.0 configure failure (bug in autoconf 2.10?)
- Date: Tue, 20 Aug 1996 10:24:25 -0700
- Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: Bob Glickstein <bobg@xxxxxxxxx> "Re: 3.0.0 configure failure (bug in autoconf 2.10?)" (Aug 20, 8:16am)
- References: <199608201516.IAA02609@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: schaefer@xxxxxxx
On Aug 20, 8:16am, Bob Glickstein wrote:
} Subject: Re: 3.0.0 configure failure (bug in autoconf 2.10?)
}
} > So just exactly who is wrong here? autoconf? gcc 2.7.0?
}
} It could be either. What causes the autoconf 2.10 version of the
} lstat test to fail? (Find out by looking in config.log after running
} configure.)
I included that in the original message.
/tmp/cca194791.o(.text+0x14): undefined reference to `lstat'
That's all, nothing else. I just figured out why it fails, though: lstat
is an *inline function only* that expands to a call to _lxstat. If you
don't include <sys/stat.h> (which the conftest does not), you can't detect
lstat.
Perhaps AC_CHECK_FUNCS is the wrong way to test for lstat? I don't have
autoconf 2.10 installed to check the info for a more specific AC_* test.
--
Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.nbn.com/people/lantern
New male in /home/schaefer:
>N 2 Justin William Schaefer Sat May 11 03:43 53/4040 "Happy Birthday"
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author