Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: alias -x?

X-seq: zsh-workers 2209
From: Zefram <zefram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Z Shell workers mailing list)
Subject: Re: alias -x?
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 1996 14:18:48 +0100 (BST)
In-reply-to: <199610091129.NAA26517@xxxxxxxxxxxx> from "Peter Stephenson" at Oct 9, 96 01:29:14 pm

>                   (Maybe Zefram could handle code to deal with
>options like `emacs', `nolog', `vi', `viraw' and `trackall' quite
>easily with the rewritten option code.)

It's not quite that simple.  When I can find some free time (ha!) I
have plans for another option patch, that was delayed by the release of
3.0.  Addition of options like `emacs' might be part of that, but what
should `[[ -o emacs ]]' do?  (I do have a reasonable answer, but my
point is that the semantics are inevitably non-obvious.)

Zoltan, are you planning to release a 3.1 to which we can add features?

-zefram

Follow-Ups:
- Re: alias -x?
  - From: Zoltan Hidvegi

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author