Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Slightly changed copyright, new test release
- X-seq: zsh-workers 2261
- From: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@xxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Slightly changed copyright, new test release
- Date: 18 Oct 1996 23:07:00 +0200
- In-reply-to: Zoltan Hidvegi's message of Fri, 18 Oct 1996 22:53:25 +0200 (MET DST)
- References: <199610182053.WAA30535@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: hniksic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Zoltan Hidvegi (hzoli@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> The new copyright notice which appears on the top of each file is
[...]
> The rest is unchanged. The change is that the documentation is not
> mentioned here and it is explicitely stated that it is allowed to
> distribute modified versions of that program. I always thought that the
> old copyright notice allowed that as well but Richard Stallman think that
> was not clear enough.
Speaking of copyright, why isn't zsh under GPL? I think it would be
better to have a standard license, rather than zsh-specific.
Is there a special reason why zsh shouldn't be under the GPL?
--
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@xxxxxxx> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
Good pings come in small packets.
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author