Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: zle_refresh trial patch (and unrelated bug)

X-seq: zsh-workers 2408
From: Zefram <zefram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: pws@xxxxxx (Peter Stephenson)
Subject: Re: zle_refresh trial patch (and unrelated bug)
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 1996 14:57:15 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <199611140903.KAA16132@xxxxxxxxxxxx> from "Peter Stephenson" at Nov 14, 96 10:03:34 am

>                                            Anything more
>sophisticated probably needs (( to have it's own type flag in struct
>Cmd.

I for one would like that to happen.  It's really annoying to have (())
changed to let when listing functions.  It's also confusing to have
(()) fail after "disable let".

>(Sorrysorry... it's against 3.1 again.  I don't have the luxury here
>of space for arbitrary versions.  I really don't think that will make
>a difference this time.)

It only really makes a difference when patching the module code
itself.  IMO we shouldn't be posting patches for `configure' itself
anyway; they are large and contain no information.  (zsh developers can
be assumed to have autoconf available.)

-zefram

References:
- Re: zle_refresh trial patch (and unrelated bug)
  - From: Peter Stephenson

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author