Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: signal weirdness fix

X-seq: zsh-workers 2482
From: Zefram <zefram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: signal weirdness fix
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 1996 11:57:56 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: zefram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <961126024255.ZM3729774@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> from "Bart Schaefer" at Nov 26, 96 02:41:51 am

>Actually, I think this is almost exactly the wrong semantic.  The whole
>point was so that zsh scripts (which are pretty much by definition not
>"interactive shells" even though the script may be doing terminal I/O)
>could have their HUP/INT/QUIT traps tripped even when not executing a
>builtin command at the time the signal came in.

Hmm.  I have no strong feeling about this, but it *would* be nice to
make sure there's a tty around when processing these signals.
isatty(0) is obviously not sufficient test, so maybe that "&& interact"
should just be removed.

-zefram

References:
- Re: signal weirdness fix
  - From: Bart Schaefer

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author