Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Vi insert-mode cursor key bindings.
- X-seq: zsh-workers 2485
- From: Duncan Sinclair <sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Zefram <zefram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Vi insert-mode cursor key bindings.
- Date: Tue, 26 Nov 1996 12:43:13 +0000
- Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 26 Nov 1996 12:10:02 +0000."
>>I'm curious.... why?
>
>Because vi doesn't bind them, and because <ESC> already has a meaning
>that its use as a prefix would interfere with.
>
>> And what happens if you bind them using bindkey?
>
>It'll work as expected.
>
>>Can we use other ESC-prefixed bindings in vi-insert mode?
>
>Yes, just bind them using bindkey.
These last two statements seem to contradict the first. If an ESC-prefix
will interfere with the command "ESC", then how then does it "work
as expected"? Or if it "works as expected", how does it interfere?
I can see a lot of e-mail to the list saying "the up-arrow key doesn't
work in vi mode". I seem to recall the same happening before.
>Have you tried using this binding after you gave i a count? Look at
>what that binding does; it's a disgusting kludge.
Agreed. But then I'm hardly likely to be using the cursor keys during
count-prefixed inserts with vi. (I don't use the cursor keys during
inserts in vi, in fact, in vi, I don't use the cursor keys at all.)
While I'm just as keen to see a good vi emulation from zle, we must
still realise that zsh is a shell, not an editor. (In vi I don't
use the cursor keys - in zsh I use them all the time.)
There are lots of people out there that think that "up-arrow,return"
is a perfectly reasonable thing to want to do, without having to hit
"esc" first. (myself included.)
If I can bind them manually - without messing up "esc" on it's own -
then I'm content. But I think it'll be a problem for other people.
Cheers,
Duncan.
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author