Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Bug in 3.0.2-test1 (no 'erase char' if zle off)
- X-seq: zsh-workers 2547
- From: gwing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- To: stucki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Bug in 3.0.2-test1 (no 'erase char' if zle off)
- Date: Mon, 9 Dec 1996 22:54:18 +1100 (EST)
- Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.3.95.961209093026.3896M-100000@petzval> from "C. v. Stuckrad" at Dec 9, 96 09:49:00 am
C. v. Stuckrad wrote:
:I compiled 3.0.2-test1 (by first unpacking a 'fresh' 3.0.1 then doing
:the big patch. The first 'hunk' in Etc/FAQ failed (I saw nothing which
:'should' brak it, so may be there are some blanks or tabs ?)
Yeah, that always fails if you start from the RCS version. I don't know about
the other version. That's because the patch contains a line with $Id$ , and
as soon as you check out the FAQ that line gets filled with RCS information
which is not static - eg. if you lock it, it will be different to an unlocked
version.
:The result of switching '-M' on is:
:- deleting 'backwards' the last char, just moves left
:- deleting a char 'inside' the linne, moves the following chars left,
: BUT 'fills' with the last char (also does no 'blanking' of the last char)
:- Control-U (erase line) only moves the cursor to the beginning of line
:- Control-K (erase rest of line) does seemingly nothing
It occurs on my machine as well. Annoying since I don't remember changing
(or anyone else changing) any code that would affect it.
Ahh, it happened between 3.0.1-test4 and 3.0.1 - sometimes having 17 old
versions does something besides taking up disk space :-)
Hopefully a patch will follow soon.
--
Geoff Wing [gwing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Technical Manager
Phone : +61-3-9818 2977 PrimeNet - Internet Consultancy
Facsimile: +61-3-9819 3788 Web : <URL:http://www.primenet.com.au/>
Mobile : 0412 162 441
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author