Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: fifo configure check (seems to work here: Solaris 2.4)
- X-seq: zsh-workers 2572
- From: "C. v. Stuckrad" <stucki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: schaefer@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: fifo configure check (seems to work here: Solaris 2.4)
- Date: Fri, 13 Dec 1996 09:58:57 +0100 (MET)
- Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <961212193711.ZM6210@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Priority: normal
- Reply-to: "C. v. Stuckrad" <stucki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Thu, 12 Dec 1996, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On Dec 13,  3:30am, Zoltan Hidvegi wrote:
> } I discovered that fifo test fails if zsh is compiled in an NFS mounted
> } directory.  The patch below shoud fix it (it's only for configure.in, you
> } need autoconf).  I did not test it but it should work.
> 
> I'm concerned that fifos won't work on the ramdisk file system that many
> newer suns are configured to use for /tmp.  (I know things like lockf()
> fail on the ramdisk.)  Can someone who has a ramdisk /tmp please try this
> soon and let us know?
After unpacking 3.0.1 on /tmp and patching (including the nfs-patch),
configure DID find FIFOs correctly. 
We have Solaris2.4 (FOUR!) and use momentarily /tmp on swap.
It might go wrong on Solaris 5.1 (did somebody else test that ?)
Stucki
Christoph von Stuckrad       * *  | talk to  | <stucki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> \
Freie Universitaet Berlin    |/_* | nickname | ...!unido!fub!leibniz!stucki|
Fachbereich Mathematik, EDV  |\ * | 'stucki' | Tel:+49 30 838-7545{9|8}    |
Arnimallee 2-6/14195 Berlin  * *  |  on IRC  | Fax:+49 30 838-5913        /
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author