Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: history-search-backward
- X-seq: zsh-workers 2858
- From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxx>, zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Zsh hackers list), Zefram <zefram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: history-search-backward
- Date: Fri, 31 Jan 1997 07:02:01 -0800
- In-reply-to: Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxx> "history-search-backward" (Jan 31, 11:47am)
- In-reply-to: Zefram <zefram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> "Re: history-search-backward" (Jan 31, 12:16pm)
- In-reply-to: Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxx> "Re: history-search-backward" (Jan 31, 1:42pm)
- References: <199701311047.LAA22677@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <8860.199701311216@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <199701311242.NAA29501@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: schaefer@xxxxxxx
On Jan 31, 11:47am, Peter Stephenson wrote:
} Subject: history-search-backward
}
} Looks like another incompatibility got in while I wasn't paying much
} attention: ^[p will only search backwards on complete words. (I
} remember the discussion, not the conclusion, I presume this is
} intentional.) It seems to me this is going to cause lots of zsh users
} endless confusion when they type part of a word, then ^[p, and nothing
} happens.
}
} It's also incompatible with the tcsh binding (it always was a bit, but
} not so drastically). It makes it essentially useless for me, too,
} since I use it as a way of abbreviating the first word of a command,
} but that's personal taste and I can live with
} history-beginning-search-backward.
I have to completely agree with Peter here.
I have both history-search-backward and history-beginning-search-backward
bound to keys, and use them for different things, but in both cases I
expect them to work on partial words; the only difference I expect is
whether they match against a prefix of the first word or a prefix of the
whole line.
On Jan 31, 12:16pm, Zefram wrote:
} Subject: Re: history-search-backward
}
} That's what history-beginning-search-backward is for. It may cause
} confusion, but only minimally, as the old behaviour wasn't documented.
I think you have no idea how wrong you are.
On Jan 31, 1:42pm, Peter Stephenson wrote:
} Subject: Re: history-search-backward
}
} Problem is, history-beginning-search-backward only got added a few
} versions ago and has never been bound, while the
} history-search-backward behaviour, partly inherited from tcsh, has
} been around for years and years whether documented or not and I don't
} imagine the general confusion will be any less.
Exactly.
} It should go in the NEWS file when the release becomes official and
} I'll put it in the FAQ.
I can't accept that as sufficient in this case.
--
Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.nbn.com/people/lantern
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author