Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: zle_refresh patch 2
- X-seq: zsh-workers 2870
- From: Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Zsh hackers list), gwing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: zle_refresh patch 2
- Date: Tue, 04 Feb 1997 09:25:21 +0100
- In-reply-to: "gwing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"'s message of "Tue, 04 Feb 1997 05:34:19 MET." <19970203183419.24003.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
gwing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> I was slightly uncertain about the correct behaviour here: should
> SINGLE_LINE_ZLE be set when it is `acting as if' it is set? If it is set,
> then if it stops acting as if it is set, does it go back to the previous
> value? I believe if yes to the former, then yes to the latter. But then,
> I don't necessarily believe yes to the former.
The `acting as if set' variable was termok: this is supposed to get
set to TERM_NOUP if the terminal can't go up and to TERM_BAD if the
terminal can't be used. The idea behind it was exactly that if
SINGLE_LINE_ZLE was not explicitly set and the terminal became a fully
usable sort then it would behave as if the option was unset again. I
don't see why termok and shortterm shouldn't be merged together, they
seem to be doing more or less the same thing. In fact, if I remember
right setting termok to TERM_NOUP should have the effect desired of
shortterm. (If not, it's not doing its job properly anyway.)
--
Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxx> Tel: +49 33762 77366
WWW: http://www.ifh.de/~pws/ Fax: +49 33762 77413
Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron --- Institut fuer Hochenergiephysik Zeuthen
DESY-IfH, 15735 Zeuthen, Germany.
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author