Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: zsh-3.1.1 on NetBSD patch & problems

X-seq: zsh-workers 2918
From: Zoltan Hidvegi <hzoli@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: gwing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: zsh-3.1.1 on NetBSD patch & problems
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 1997 16:22:52 +0100 (MET)
Cc: zefram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <19970219142316.23357.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> from "gwing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" at "Feb 20, 97 01:23:15 am"
Organization: Dept. of Comp. Sci., Eotvos University, Budapest, Hungary
Phone: (36 1)2669833 ext: 2667, home phone: (36 1) 2752368

gwing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Anyway, my gcc man page says:
> ``without this option, certain GNU extensions and traditional C features
> are supported as well.  With this option, they are rejected.  There is no
> reason to use this option; it exists only to satisfy pedants.''
> 
> Oh well, if it makes you happy...

Withous -pedantic, gcc does not warn about missing (char *) <->
(unsigned char *) casts.  Some compilers reject the code  and some
give you warnings on that.

And several people submitted patches which later had to be changed to add
these missing casts.

References:
- Re: zsh-3.1.1 on NetBSD patch & problems
  - From: gwing

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author