Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: case $? fails

X-seq: zsh-workers 2944
From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <hzoli@xxxxxxxxxxxx> (Zoltan T. Hidvegi), zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: case $? fails
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 08:20:02 -0800
In-reply-to: <hzoli@xxxxxxxxxxxx> (Zoltan T. Hidvegi) "Re: case $? fails" (Feb 27, 4:50pm)
References: <9702272150.AA15381@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: schaefer@xxxxxxx

On Feb 27,  4:50pm,  (Zoltan T. Hidvegi) wrote:
} Subject: Re: case $? fails
}
} prints zero.  The patch below fixes these.  The for syntax is new in
} zsh-3.1 so the first two hunks should be removed if the patch is applied
} against zsh-3.0.3-test4.

The first two hunks?  Or the second two hunks?

I've now tried this a couple of different ways and can't get it to apply
to 3.0.3-test4.  Could you send a patch specifically for that?

-- 
Bart Schaefer                             Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts            http://www.nbn.com/people/lantern

Follow-Ups:
- Re: case $? fails
  - From: hzoli

References:
- Re: case $? fails
  - From: hzoli

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author