Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: test patches
- X-seq: zsh-workers 3104
- From: <hzoli@xxxxxxxxxxxx> (Zoltan T. Hidvegi)
- To: hniksic@xxxxxxx (Hrvoje Niksic)
- Subject: Re: test patches
- Date: Fri, 9 May 1997 13:50:06 -0400 (EDT)
- In-reply-to: <kighggdoyu5.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> from Hrvoje Niksic at "May 9, 97 10:04:50 am"
- Sender: <hzoli@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> Would it be too much work (or too much braindamage, for that matter),
> to do what bash does in cases of `{foo' and `foo bar}' -- i.e. pretend
> the expansion is not there.
>
> bash$ {foo
> bash: {foo: command not found
> bash$ foo bar}
> bash: foo: command not found
No, it would not be too much work. In fact, zsh now contains extra code to
aupport {foo and bar}. There was a beta release before 3.0.0 where I tried
to drop this but there were too much complains. Maybe we need an option
like BROKEN_ZSH_BRACES :-). The problem is that some old zsh scripts
define functions as foo(){echo bar} instead of foo () { echo bar; }.
Zoltan
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author