Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: zsh reference card[s]
- X-seq: zsh-workers 3654
- From: Bruce Stephens <B.Stephens@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Zsh hackers list)
- Subject: Re: zsh reference card[s]
- Date: Tue, 16 Dec 1997 13:55:38 +0000
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 16 Dec 1997 14:06:45 +0100." <199712161306.OAA23416@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
pws@xxxxxx said:
> What's better, one huge document or two smaller ones? It could be
> three with builtins, which would probably be a good idea to include
> since there are plenty of commands like read and print where I can
> never remember the options. (I don't suppose anyone apart from Sven
> and Zefram knows all the options for compctl.)
Probably separate ones. What's in the current one is great: they're all
things I'm likely to want to look up without necessarily needing the manpage.
I did think of compctl, but if I'm doing anything with that, I'm probably
going to need the manpage anyway. (Obviously, this will vary from person to
person!)
Using LaTeX rather than hacked TeX is better as far as I'm concerned. Lots of
the GNU documentation is lovely, but I'd like it using postscript fonts (so it
will re-scale nicely) which is still non-trivial to do.
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author