Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: zsh-workers: zsh-3.1.4
- X-seq: zsh-workers 4032
- From: Zefram <zefram@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: luomat+Lists/Zsh/workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Timothy J Luoma)
- Subject: Re: zsh-workers: zsh-3.1.4
- Date: Tue, 2 Jun 1998 08:21:16 +0100 (BST)
- Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <199806011633.MAA26654@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> from "Timothy J Luoma" at Jun 1, 98 12:33:53 pm
Timothy J Luoma wrote:
>Yet another reason, is it not, why /bin/sh should be /bin/sh and not
>/bin/something-that-wants-to-pretend-it-is-sh ????
No, plenty of `real' sh's choke on that construct. We cater to
idiosyncracies of Bourne shell variants right back to V6 (hence no shell
functions); bash now counts as such a variant, though it doesn't seem
to have any special restrictions not present in any earlier sh.
>TjL, still wondering why people fix things that aren't broken
With me, it's a case of "I know it works in practice, but does it work
in theory?".
-zefram
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author