Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: up-line-or-search still 'fixed'!

X-seq: zsh-workers 4087
From: Bruce Stephens <b.stephens@xxxxxxxxx>
To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: up-line-or-search still 'fixed'!
Date: 10 Jun 1998 12:57:44 +0100
In-reply-to: Zefram's message of "Wed, 10 Jun 1998 11:31:14 +0100 (BST)"
References: <199806101031.LAA12567@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: B.Stephens@xxxxxxxxx

Zefram <zefram@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Bruce Stephens wrote:
> >Another one---which I think I'd find acceptable---would be not to move
> >the cursor, so history-search-backward would always search for the
> >text before the cursor.  Or has that been tried, and people hated it?
> 
> That's exactly what history-beginning-search-* do.

Doh.  And it's even what M-p, M-n are bound to.  So is the problem
that people really like(d) the behaviour of going to the end of the
line?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: up-line-or-search still 'fixed'!
  - From: Bart Schaefer

References:
- Re: up-line-or-search still 'fixed'!
  - From: Zefram

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author