Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: zsh exits suddenly.
- X-seq: zsh-workers 4163
- From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: zsh exits suddenly.
- Date: Wed, 24 Jun 1998 09:17:12 -0700
- Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Zsh hackers list)
- In-reply-to: <9806240851.AA45920@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <9806240851.AA45920@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Jun 24, 10:51am, Peter Stephenson wrote:
} Subject: Re: zsh exits suddenly.
}
} I can't be absolutely sure if all that lastc stuff is really needed.
} It means, of course, that if there is more than one line in the
} buffer, only the current one is flushed. Is this the right behaviour?
This isn't changed by your patch, right? It was the behavior all along?
I think the intent is to prevent accept-line from executing a partial
line following a tty interrupt. That probably ought to apply to multi-
line buffers as well. The guideline should probably be, what does ZLE
do to a multiline buffer when send-break is executed? The SIGINT handler
ought to do the same thing. (In fact, why doesn't it call sendbreak()
when ZLE is active?)
--
Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author