Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Bug? in 'integer' behaviour
- X-seq: zsh-workers 4410
- From: Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Bug? in 'integer' behaviour
- Date: Mon, 05 Oct 1998 11:33:55 +0200
- Cc: Phil Pennock <phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: ""Bart Schaefer""'s message of "Mon, 05 Oct 1998 02:20:13 DFT." <981005022013.ZM1469@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
`integer z=$(wc -l <"$1")' gives $z = 0:
Bart wrote:
> } I think it's the trailing characters after the number which are causing
> } the problem. From wc you get something like
> } 128 .zshrc
>
> No, that can't be right. Note that input is being redirected to wc, so
> it doesn't produce the trailing file name.
You're quite right, things like "<" aren't so obvious first thing on
Monday morning. I looked a little further and here's what's
happening:
% showargs() { print -l $*; }
% showargs z=$(wc -l <~/.zshrc)
z=
168
Replace `showargs' by integer and you'll see that the first argument
is z=, so that z gets 0, then the $(...) substitution splits words on
the initial spaces, and the second argument is 168. I haven't looked
to see what zsh thinks it's doing with `integer 168', but the
word-splitting here does seem to be standard Bourne/Korn shell
behaviour.
So the real workaround is
integer "z=$(wc -l <$1)"
or
integer z
z=$(wc -l <"$1")
It's a little confusing that the argument to an `integer' isn't
handled the same as a straight assignment, but I don't see a way
around.
--
Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Tel: +39 050 844536
WWW: http://www.ifh.de/~pws/
Gruppo Teorico, Dipartimento di Fisica
Piazza Torricelli 2, 56100 Pisa, Italy
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author