Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: PATCH: Docs out of sync
- X-seq: zsh-workers 4757
- From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Phil Pennock <phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: PATCH: Docs out of sync
- Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1998 23:45:19 -0800
- In-reply-to: <19981209194311.62754@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <19981209032532.54741@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <9812090901.AA23162@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <19981209194311.62754@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Dec 9, 7:43pm, Phil Pennock wrote:
} Subject: PATCH: Docs out of sync
}
} Typing away merrily, Peter Stephenson produced the immortal words:
} > Phil Pennock wrote:
} > > * bash has arrays. 'declare', 'local' & 'readonly' each accept '-a' to
} > > declare an array. Is it reasonable to add '-a' to 'typeset'? This
} > > would automatically duplicate the bash-ism.
} >
} > It's not exactly essential, since bash and zsh have rather different
} > extensions to sh in any case. They're only similar in as much as they
} > both include sh. It's hard enough keeping ksh emulation working.
}
} Looking through the source for 3.1.5-patched, bin_typeset et al accept
} -a. This is undocumented. This functionality is not in 3.1.5.
} With no arguments beyond the options, "typeset -a" scans the parameter
} table for arrays. "typeset -A" scans for hashes. An added bonus! ;^)
It was actually typeset -A that I was adding, and -a was the bonus.
} Except that "typeset -a foo" is silently ignored. An unhandled case
} later on.
It's an unhandled case because the code (from prior to my patch) has an
explicit on &= ~PM_ARRAY; in the loop that creates the
parameters when they don't already exist. I think that's there because
the syntax typeset array=(x y z) doesn't make it through the
parser, but I don't know for sure so I didn't mess with it.
Anyway, it's not correct to say that `typeset -a foo` is ignored -- it
DOES create the parameter foo, but it creates it as a scalar, not as an
array, which is exactly what used to happen with `typeset foo=(x y z)`
before (x y z) started being interpreted as a glob modifier. (Now it
says "unknown file attribute" and fails entirely.)
} Scanning back, Bart added this functionality in patch 4608 (Nov 12).
} It was documented in the article, but no docs patch. The options to
} 'local' were also modified.
I didn't give a doc patch because none of this stuff is stable yet; the
syntax may change, etc. (Though `typeset -A` is unlikely to change, as
it's ksh compatible.)
} Docs patch included at end of this article.
Thanks, but ...
--
Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author