Re: experimental new style completion

[Sven Wischnowsky <wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Phil Pennock wrote:

> 
> Typing away merrily, Sven Wischnowsky produced the immortal words:
> [...]
> > +         eval b\=\( \$\{b:/\*\(${(j:|:)fignore}\)\} \)
> [...]
> > +         eval c\=\( \$\{c:/\*\(${(j:|:)fignore}\)\} \)
> 
> One has to wonder about a shell where /that/ is valid input.
> 
> Whilst it's nice and understandable to people who're extensively
> familiar, doesn't anyone else think it's time to sit back and try and
> look at this syntax objectively?
> 
> (At least, almost understandable... oh yeah, understandable)

;-)

Btw, this is the simple solution. I first tried to integrate it into
the globbing itself but failed utterly.

Bye
 Sven


--
Sven Wischnowsky                         wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx