Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: zsh-3.1.5-pws-5: mixing "old" and "new" completions?
- X-seq: zsh-workers 5081
- From: Sven Wischnowsky <wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: zsh-3.1.5-pws-5: mixing "old" and "new" completions?
- Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 12:59:34 +0100 (MET)
- In-reply-to: Peter Stephenson's message of Thu, 28 Jan 1999 12:28:06 +0100
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
Peter Stephenson wrote:
> ...
>
> I'd better leave zle -c to Sven, since I haven't had much time to look
> at all the details. I mentioned some time ago I was unhappy about the
> setting/unsetting of the existing zle parameters like $BUFFER, which
> still needs looking at, I don't know if it applies to Sven's new ones.
I remember that there was aproblem, but don't remember which, we'll see...
> ...
>
> So I would propose simply removing zle -C, and being ready to document
> various how-to's in the compctl manual when the new stuff becomes
> fixed. It hasn't been in any archived version, so I hope there won't
> be many cries of woe.
Hm, your stuff is still simpler (although I'd like to inherit the
upper case `C' ;-).
> By the way: I stumbled on compadd -p ${match:h}/ -f ${match:t}
> to get the listing to work the way it normally does for files. Is
> this the approved way, or is the something better?
Yes, this is what I expected, but I'll comment in this in my reply
which I'm working on.
Bye
Sven
--
Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author