Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: zsh-3.1.5-pws-5: mixing "old" and "new" completions?
- X-seq: zsh-workers 5087
- From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: zsh-3.1.5-pws-5: mixing "old" and "new" completions?
- Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 08:31:06 -0800
- In-reply-to: <9901281128.AA14788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <9901281128.AA14788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Jan 28, 12:28pm, Peter Stephenson wrote:
} Subject: Re: zsh-3.1.5-pws-5: mixing "old" and "new" completions?
}
} I'm increasingly of the opinion we can do without zle -C. [...]
} So I would propose simply removing zle -C, and being ready to document
} various how-to's in the compctl manual when the new stuff becomes
} fixed. It hasn't been in any archived version, so I hope there won't
} be many cries of woe.
Sounds fine to me (and would give over to Sven the "-C" option). As I
said elsewhere, I don't think anybody running any version of 3.1.x has
much call for woeful cries; the whole point of a development version is
to be able to change stuff until it works right. (3.0.x users are
another matter, but not at issue here.)
--
Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author