Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: PATCH zsh-3.1.5-pws-7: cygwin make fixes
- X-seq: zsh-workers 5314
- From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Matt Armstrong" <mattarmst@xxxxxxxxxxx>, zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: PATCH zsh-3.1.5-pws-7: cygwin make fixes
- Date: Sun, 7 Feb 1999 23:26:42 -0800
- In-reply-to: <19990208064924.18981.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <19990208064924.18981.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxx>
On Feb 7, 10:49pm, Matt Armstrong wrote:
} Subject: PATCH zsh-3.1.5-pws-7: cygwin make fixes
}
} I fixed #2 by re-doing the way signames.c is created. Instead of a AWK
} script that gets run on a signal.h file, a C program is compiled and
} run. This gets it right even if the signal.h file is hard to parse.
I haven't examined the patch in detail to check this, but did you make
sure that the compilation of this program is performed in such a way that
it executes correctly on the current hardware even when cross-compiling
for another architecture?
} My fix for #1 may be controversial because it may break for people who
} need to keep using an older autoconf. Is upgrading a problem?
It'd be better if it weren't necessary. Copy it into aczsh.m4 and give
it a different name, e.g zsh_EXEEXT ?
} My fix for #2, I think, is a good thing. ;-) I'd do the same thing for
} the RLIMIT stuff if cygwin had RLIMIT stuff.
It's not a good thing if it won't cross-compile. I didn't use to pay much
attention to this, but I've just been through this particular plane of hell
with procmail's build system (which even compiles and runs C programs to do
sed-like substition on its man page templates!) so I'm feeling sensitive.
--
Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author