Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
PATCH: unset and assoc (was Re: Let's finish this new completion stuff)
- X-seq: zsh-workers 5490
- From: Sven Wischnowsky <wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: PATCH: unset and assoc (was Re: Let's finish this new completion stuff)
- Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 13:54:07 +0100 (MET)
- In-reply-to: "Bart Schaefer"'s message of Sun, 21 Feb 1999 16:15:42 -0800
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
Bart Schaefer wrote:
> zagzig% typeset -A foo
> zagzig% echo ${+foo[x]}
> 1
> zagzig% typeset -a bar
> zagzig% echo ${+bar[x]}
> 0
>
> That is, all fields of associative arrays currently appear to be set,
> even when they aren't; this is not true of plain arrays.
The problem was that at the time the lookup in the hastable occurs,
there is an struct pm for it with the PM_UNSET flag set. The patch
below makes this flag be tested in subst.c. I think this is the
simplest solution and the tests I did worked, does anyone see any
problems with this?
Bye
Sven
--- os/subst.c Mon Feb 22 10:49:23 1999
+++ Src/subst.c Tue Feb 23 13:47:42 1999
@@ -999,11 +999,12 @@
if (!(v = fetchvalue((subexp ? &ov : &s), (wantt ? -1 :
((unset(KSHARRAYS) || inbrace) ? 1 : -1)),
- hkeys|hvals)))
+ hkeys|hvals)) ||
+ (v->pm && (v->pm->flags & PM_UNSET)))
vunset = 1;
if (wantt) {
- if (v) {
+ if (v && v->pm && !(v->pm->flags & PM_UNSET)) {
int f = v->pm->flags;
switch (PM_TYPE(f)) {
--
Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author