Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: completion features
- X-seq: zsh-workers 5765
- From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: completion features
- Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 14:06:01 -0800 (PST)
- Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Zsh hackers list)
- In-reply-to: <9903111702.AA42488@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <9903111702.AA42488@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Peter Stephenson writes:
> Something like ++^D when you have correction set to 2 will allow anything
> at all to be completed, assuming there was no exact match. Sven mentioned
> something about this, but it looks particularly funny here. What are we
> going to do?
> - max no. of corrections is one *less* than length of prefix+suffix?
I like this.
> - assume users, unlike me, are smart enough to cope?
I don't think we should assume that any users unlike you are able to cope,
_especially_ if you aren't able to.
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author