Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Out of the box user experience
- X-seq: zsh-workers 5833
- From: Bruce Stephens <B.Stephens@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Out of the box user experience
- Date: 16 Mar 1999 16:26:39 +0000
- In-reply-to: Bart Schaefer's message of "Tue, 16 Mar 1999 08:08:23 -0800 (PST)"
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <9903161337.AA61220@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <vbn21d4ims.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <14062.33271.114859.375989@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: B.Stephens@xxxxxxxxx
Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Please let's NOT encourage admins to installed canned /etc/z* files.
> They very seldom accomplish what the admin thought they would, and I
> don't want to give anyone the impression that StartupFiles contains
> stuff that we believe should appear in /etc/z* -- because it
> doesn't.
I wasn't suggesting that! I agree absolutely that administrators
should consider carefully what, if anything, should go into /etc/z*.
> > I'm guessing they regard the example functions and things as
> > documentation, and install it into /usr/doc/zsh-$ZSH_VERSION.
>
> Yes; `rpm -ql zsh` says:
[...]
Right, that all looks sensible. I still like the idea of installing
scripts into $prefix/share or something, and defining a convenience
variable that points at them.
If nobody beats me to it, I may make a patch for that. Would it be
helpful if I wrote an RPM spec file? (I have no experience whatsoever
in doing this, but I've been reading about it recently.)
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author