Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
RE: PATCH: compset (testing and modification)
- X-seq: zsh-workers 5943
- From: Sven Wischnowsky <wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: PATCH: compset (testing and modification)
- Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 17:37:30 +0100 (MET)
- In-reply-to: "Andrej Borsenkow"'s message of Thu, 25 Mar 1999 18:25:56 +0300
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
Andrej Borsenkow wrote:
> > Of course, we could remove the condition codes (why?), or replace them
> > with an extra option (say `-q') to `compset' which makes it only do
> > the tests and set the return value (no modification).
> >
>
> I would second that. `-t' for "test only"?
You forgot to give me a good reason for this ;-)
But seriously: I like them. I especially like the possibility to put
them together with other tests inside a `[[...]]'.
And: why `-t'? Unix commands normally use the `-q' I suggested for this
kind of behavior.
Both?
Bye
Sven
P.S.: Btw, all this would come with very little extra code.
--
Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author