Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
RE: PATCH: manual for example completion
- X-seq: zsh-workers 5988
- From: Sven Wischnowsky <wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: PATCH: manual for example completion
- Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 12:54:15 +0200 (MET DST)
- In-reply-to: "Andrej Borsenkow"'s message of Tue, 30 Mar 1999 13:50:17 +0400
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
Andrej Borsenkow wrote:
> patching file Doc/zsh.yo
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 66.
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 79 with fuzz 1.
> 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file Doc/zsh.yo.rej
> patching file Doc/zshcompsys.yo
Hm, dunno, I don't get this (not even with an unchanged pws-14), and
as far as I can see there weren't any patches for `zsh.yo' for quite
some time.
> I always hesitated to suggest it as it was deemed "experimental" :-) But I
> thought, it would go in "Programmable completion". First part, describing
> compctl, and the second part, describing "Shell based completion". Seems
> natural? Both are closely related anyway.
Well the compctl-manpage is already big enough, I think. Also, for me
at least they are not so closely related as for someone who proposed
`compcall' and what is now `compctl -i'. Finally I think that at least
the description of the example system should be kept separately -- I
even hesitated to put it into zshall/zsh.texi at all. After all, this
is shell code and thus is completely different from what the rest of
the docs describes.
Bye
Sven
--
Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author