Re: Somewhere between modules-bltn and zmodload ....

[Sven Wischnowsky <wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Bart Schaefer wrote:

> [ about xmods.conf ]
> 
> I think the x is for "extension."  (But why isn't modules-bltn called
> "bmods.conf" or something?  Maybe we should clean all this up, too.)

Yes, I think we shoudl. I'm still sometimes guessing which file I have 
to fiddle with to get what I want. (And I have to guess the name and
which vowels are there and which aren't...)

> Is is really the right behavior that zmodload go on and unload the rest
> of the conditions listed on the command line after one has failed?  Or
> should it stop when it gets to a failure?  I suppose the analogy is to
> "rm", but I was a bit surprised by it.

[It's the same for removing the other autoloaded things, btw.]

I think I like it this way, but then I have used this only when
hacking the module code.

Bye
 Sven


--
Sven Wischnowsky                         wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx