Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: PATCH: 3.1.5-pws-N: unset fix
- X-seq: zsh-workers 6371
- From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Zsh hackers list)
- Subject: Re: PATCH: 3.1.5-pws-N: unset fix
- Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 01:28:46 +0000
- In-reply-to: <9905071340.AA43256@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <9905071340.AA43256@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On May 7, 3:40pm, Peter Stephenson wrote:
} Subject: PATCH: 3.1.5-pws-N: unset fix
}
} The first hunk of this is relevant to 3.0.6, although the if (pm->flags &
} PM_UNSET) test needs adding by hand.
Are you sure this is relevant to 3.0.6? As far as I know, prior to the
associative array changes in 3.1.5+ parameters with PM_UNSET were never
permitted to appear in the paramtab. (So the 3.1.5+ bug is probably my
fault for missing a spot where PM_UNSET needed to be tested.)
} [...] in 3.0.6 [...] I noticed that if a parameter that was local in one
} function is unset in a function called from that, it will be restored next
} time in global scope [...] which may not be intended [...]
} so it may be a bug. Should I send a patch for both for 3.0.6?
You should either send a patch or make mention of the difference in the
FAQ somewhere, or perhaps both.
--
Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author