Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: pws-19 + all patches: config.h unconditionally recreated by config.status

X-seq: zsh-workers 6377
From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Andrej Borsenkow" <borsenkow.msk@xxxxxx>, "ZSH workers mailing list" <zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: pws-19 + all patches: config.h unconditionally recreated by config.status
Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 07:55:29 +0000
In-reply-to: <000501beab39$4ff45210$21c9ca95@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <000501beab39$4ff45210$21c9ca95@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On May 31, 11:43am, Andrej Borsenkow wrote:
} Subject: RE: pws-19 + all patches: config.h unconditionally recreated by c
}
} Is it possible, that
} autoconf version makes a difference? I have here autoconf-2.13.

Yes, that's certainly possible, in fact even likely.  I've got 2.12.

-- 
Bart Schaefer                                 Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts              http://www.brasslantern.com

References:
- RE: pws-19 + all patches: config.h unconditionally recreated by config.status
  - From: Andrej Borsenkow

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author