RE: More intellegent suffix removing?

[Sven Wischnowsky <wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Andrej Borsenkow wrote:

> > The patch would be the thing below (are there any other characters
> > where this would be the right thing?). It looks a bit ugly when this
> > happens after typing a `<' or `>', though.
> 
> Hmm ... as I found recently, at least `<' can quite legitimately be part of
> word (<m-n> globbing). What a surprise :-) And is interpreted as such by
> zsh; `cat<' is different from `cat <'

But only if there is also a `>' and the stuff them forms a valid
number range (and, of course, you must have the right options set).

I wasn't very happy with the space-removal on redirection operators
anyway, though. But to make this right, we would need to leave a space 
if that was added and to replace a slash (if one was added) with a
space. There is no way to do this easily for now.

Bye
 Sven


--
Sven Wischnowsky                         wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx