Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: Small problem with suspend-a-loop patch (6707)

X-seq: zsh-workers 6769
From: Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Small problem with suspend-a-loop patch (6707)
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 17:47:24 +0200
In-reply-to: "Sven Wischnowsky"'s message of "Mon, 21 Jun 1999 13:20:10 DFT." <199906211120.NAA22572@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm

Sven Wischnowsky wrote:
> Bart Schaefer wrote:
> 
> > The first time a loop is suspended and then brought back into the foregroun
> d,
> > the job status is reported incorrectly; every time thereafter it's correct.
> 
> Oh. there was this explicit test to avoid setting the status of the
> last process of a super-job to SP_RUNNING (the last process is the
> shell forked for the tail of a pipeline).

This has fixed another problem that if you put a foreground process into
the background it wasn't reported when it exited.

-- 
Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>       Tel: +39 050 844536
WWW:  http://www.ifh.de/~pws/
Dipartimento di Fisica, Via Buonarroti 2, 56127 Pisa, Italy

References:
- Re: Small problem with suspend-a-loop patch (6707)
  - From: Sven Wischnowsky

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author