Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: PATCH: collist v2.0
- X-seq: zsh-workers 6781
- From: Sven Wischnowsky <wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: PATCH: collist v2.0
- Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 12:35:18 +0200 (MET DST)
- In-reply-to: Peter Stephenson's message of Tue, 22 Jun 1999 10:51:43 +0200
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
Peter Stephenson wrote:
> It's hard to know what to do. You don't expect to be able to set an option
> only when a module is loaded, so I don't think we can have module-dependent
> options. But zle related options are in the main shell even if zle isn't
> loaded. Maybe we just have to make it an option (menuselect, obviously)
> anyway and make a bigger effort to load complist when necessary, so you
> would get an error from completion the first time if it's not available.
We can make modules autoloadable on options -- triggered by
(|un)setopt. But then there is still the problem with local options
and all that...
> - some new options will list all modules or builtin modules. This is
> probably better but the problem is that with a non-dynamically-linked
> shell you always get no output from running `zmodload' on its own which
> is a little Zen-like. Maybe it should return status 1 in that case as a
> test for dynamic loading, but status 0 when the list includes builtin
> modules.
I'd vote for using the exit status and even let these list-options
accept optional arguments. With arguments they just check if the
modules named are loaded (or can be loaded?).
> And I still think the zle command needs the ability to list builtin
> widgets, too.
Definitely, yes -- see 6775.
> One other thing: I'm still a bit worried about the way undo works, where
> the first time nothing happens if there isn't a suffix to undo. It's fine
> if there is a suffix which you can undo separately, but I'd be tempted to
> make it skip over that if it does nothing. That would make it harder if
> you used undo in programming, however, but I don't think people do.
Maybe an option to undo saying if you want to skip `invisible' undos
or not?
> I've done this and I'll try and get pws-$((N+1)) out at the end of the
> week, particularly since I'm busy next week. There were some other minor
> changes: a tt(no) in the manual was missing a close parenthesis, some
> dependencies for mod_complist.yo needed adding in the Makefile, a nodref
> referred to `The complist module' instead of `The complist Module'. These
> are appended below, but it assmues the name changes.
Oh, yes. I forgot to test-make the docs, sorry.
And thanks!
Bye
Sven
--
Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author