Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: extended compctl bug in 3.1.5
- X-seq: zsh-workers 6786
- From: Sven Wischnowsky <wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: extended compctl bug in 3.1.5
- Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 15:31:15 +0200 (MET DST)
- Cc: greg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Greg Klanderman)
- In-reply-to: greg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx's message of Tue, 22 Jun 1999 09:21:47 -0400 (EDT)
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
Greg Klanderman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I hope this example will illustrate two bugs in using the "R" pattern
> in extended completion:
>
> compctl -k '(foo bar)' -x 'R[bar,foo]' -k '(a b c)' \
> - 'R[foo,;]' -k '(1 2 3)' -- foobar
>
> First, type "foobar foo", with no space after "foo" and hit TAB. You
> get a beep and no completions, because the 'R[foo,;]' clause is
> matching even though you are not after but ON the word with prefix
> 'foo'. I would expect it to complete "foo" by appending the suffix
> space.
Yes, we should probably avoid this.
> Second, type "foobar foo bar ", with a space after "bar". Hit TAB and
> you get the completions "a", "b", and "c", which you should not, as
> you are not before "foo".
This, however is intentional -- think about cases where you want to
have multiple groups of `foo ... bar'. But the manual could be
clearer...
I don't know if you can apply this patch to an unmodified 3.1.5.
Bye
Sven
diff -u os/Zle/zle_tricky.c Src/Zle/zle_tricky.c
--- os/Zle/zle_tricky.c Tue Jun 22 11:51:29 1999
+++ Src/Zle/zle_tricky.c Tue Jun 22 15:24:27 1999
@@ -5631,7 +5631,7 @@
case CCT_RANGEPAT:
if (cc->type == CCT_RANGEPAT)
tokenize(sc = dupstring(cc->u.l.a[i]));
- for (j = clwpos; j; j--) {
+ for (j = clwpos - 1; j > 0; j--) {
untokenize(s = ztrdup(clwords[j]));
if (cc->type == CCT_RANGESTR)
sc = rembslash(cc->u.l.a[i]);
diff -u od/Zsh/compctl.yo Doc/Zsh/compctl.yo
--- od/Zsh/compctl.yo Tue Jun 22 11:51:38 1999
+++ Doc/Zsh/compctl.yo Tue Jun 22 15:26:22 1999
@@ -633,7 +633,8 @@
)
item(tt(r[)var(str1)tt(,)var(str2)tt(])...)(
Matches if the cursor is after a word with prefix var(str1). If there
-is also a word with prefix var(str2) on the command line it matches
+is also a word with prefix var(str2) on the command line after the one
+matched by var(str1) it matches
only if the cursor is before this word. If the comma and var(str2) are
omitted, it matches if the cursor is after a word with prefix var(str1).
)
--
Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author