Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Diff file for 3.1.6-test-2 available
- X-seq: zsh-workers 7222
- From: Sven Wischnowsky <wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Diff file for 3.1.6-test-2 available
- Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 14:20:08 +0200 (MET DST)
- In-reply-to: Peter Stephenson's message of Tue, 20 Jul 1999 13:38:21 +0200
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
Peter Stephenson wrote:
> Sven Wischnowsky wrote:
> > > - complist could be made to work better with dynamic loading systems
> > > that don't make symbols in other dynamic modules visible
> >
> > Hm, I just had a look at this. If I've counted correctly, there are 38
> > symbols used. Four of them could reasonably be put into minfo. But
> > adding 34 pointer variables just to support SunOS 4? And then: other
> > modules may rely (now or in the future) on the symbols of other
> > modules on which they depend anyway (after all this is one of the
> > reasons for the dependency system, isn't it?).
>
> You mean function symbols? Variable symbols are easy, the definition can
> just be shifted. For the rest, if it can't be simplified it should
> probably be left. I was wondering about the possibility of defining the
> pointer to the list of thingies in comp1, and calling any of those via the
> list. But that doesn't seem to cover very many.
Oops, right. It's 18 functions, 4 widgets (-functions), and 16
variables. Hm.
> However, if it's not going to work there's no point compiling complist.
> There needs to be a warning much earlier on, or we need to suggest building
> zle into the shell.
I was thinking about the latter -- for SunOS 4.
Bye
Sven
--
Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author