Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: PATCH: new parameter flag?

X-seq: zsh-workers 7575
From: Zefram <zefram@xxxxxxxx>
To: wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Sven Wischnowsky)
Subject: Re: PATCH: new parameter flag?
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 13:25:56 +0100 (BST)
Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <199908311145.NAA29781@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> from Sven Wischnowsky at "Aug 31, 1999 1:45:59 pm"
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm

Sven Wischnowsky wrote:
>+	opts[PROMPTPERCENT] = 1;
>+	if (presc < 2)
>+	    opts[PROMPTSUBST] = opts[PROMPTBANG] = 0;

No, that's nasty.  I can see a need for % expansion, and I can see
a need for prompt expansion, but prompt expansion with % sequences
unconditionally enabled?  If the user wants something so obscure, they
can twiddle the options themselves.  Make the above

	if (presc < 2) {
	    opts[PROMPTPERCENT] = 1;
	    opts[PROMPTSUBST] = opts[PROMPTBANG] = 0;
	}

-zefram

References:
- Re: PATCH: new parameter flag?
  - From: Sven Wischnowsky

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author