Re: recexact in 3.1.6

[Sven Wischnowsky <wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Will Day wrote:

> Option "recexact" doesn't seem to work quite right for me under 3.1.6, or
> at least not as well as it did under 3.1.5:

We had some changes to the option handling some months ago but I don't 
rmember everything about it.

Maybe this is just a remnant of times where we didn't have the extra
code to find out if the string on the line was inserted by the
completion code or if it was typed by the user. If it is, the patch
below is probably the right thing.

Since I don't use REC_EXACT, I have to ask for everyone's help here to 
tell me if the behavior with the patch below is what you want/like/expect.

Bye
 Sven

diff -u os/Zle/zle_tricky.c Src/Zle/zle_tricky.c
--- os/Zle/zle_tricky.c	Tue Aug 31 13:25:43 1999
+++ Src/Zle/zle_tricky.c	Wed Sep  1 11:50:58 1999
@@ -4482,7 +4482,7 @@
 
 	hasunqu = 0;
 	useline = (lst != COMP_LIST_COMPLETE);
-	useexact = (isset(RECEXACT) && usemenu != 1);
+	useexact = isset(RECEXACT);
 	uselist = (useline ?
 		   ((isset(AUTOLIST) && !isset(BASHAUTOLIST)) ? 
 		    (isset(LISTAMBIGUOUS) ? 3 : 2) : 0) : 1);

--
Sven Wischnowsky                         wischnow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx