Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: PATCH: more fun with _arguments
- X-seq: zsh-workers 7694
- From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: PATCH: more fun with _arguments
- Date: Tue, 7 Sep 1999 15:58:15 +0000
- In-reply-to: <199909060823.KAA29384@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <199909060823.KAA29384@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Sep 6, 10:23am, Sven Wischnowsky wrote:
} Subject: PATCH: more fun with _arguments
}
} - add the utility function `funcall' to `compinit' which is a slightly
} better version of the hook-calling function I suggested some time
} ago (should we use a different name?)
Yes, we should use a different name. I don't have a good one off the top
of my head, but it should be something indicating it's related to the
completion system; I think "funcall" is too generic.
} -- the syntax is probably a bit too ugly, even for my standards.
Chuckle.
--
Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author